Aflicibercept is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of fragments of extracellular domains of human receptors VEGF 1 (VEGFR-1) and 2 (VEGFR-2), connected with Fc-fragment of human immunoglobulin G (IgGl).
Aflibercept is produced by K1 cells of the Chinese hamster ovary (JAX; CHO) using recombinant DNA technology.
Aflibercept acts as a soluble receptor-trap that binds VEGF-A (vascular endothelial growth factor A) and PIGF (placental growth factor) with a higher affinity than their natural receptors, and thus can inhibit the binding and activation of these related VEGF receptors.
Mechanism of action
Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and placental growth factor (PIGF) are members of the family VEGF angiogenic factors that have a powerful mitogenic, chemotactic effect on endothelial cells and increase vascular permeability. VEGF acts through two types of tyrosine kinase receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, represented on the surface of endothelial cells. PIGF communicates only with VEGFR-1, which are also present on the surface of leukocytes. Over-activation VEGF-And these receptors can lead to pathological neovascularization and excessive vascular permeability. In these processes PIGF can exhibit synergies with VEGF-A, and also stimulates leukocyte infiltration and vascular inflammation.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Neovascular ("wet" form) age-related macular degeneration ("wet" form of AMD)
The "wet" form of AMD is characterized by pathological neovascularization of the choroid. Seepage of blood and fluid from a pathologically neovascularized choroid can cause thickening of the central retina (CP) or edema and / or hemorrhage in the retina / subretinal space, which leads to a decrease in visual acuity.
The safety and efficacy of Eilea ® in the "wet" form of AMD was evaluated in two randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-control studies VIEW1 and VIEW2. In these studies, 2412 patients were randomized in a ratio of 1: 1: 1: 1 to Eilea ® (1817 patients) or ranibizumab in the following regimens:
1) Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly injections (Eilea® 2q8);
2) Eilea® 2 mg every 4 weeks (Eilea® 2q4);
3) Eilea® 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (Eilea® 0,5q4);
4) Ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (ranibizumab 0,5q4).
The study included patients aged 49 to 99 years, the average age was 76 years. About 89% of patients (1616 of 1817) randomized to Eilea® groups were 65 years of age or older, about 63% (1139 of 1817) - aged 75 years or older.
In the second year of the study, patients continued to receive the drugs at the same dose as was prescribed initially,but in the modified dosing regimen, which, according to the protocol, was based on the results of changes in visual acuity and anatomical parameters, with a maximum interval between injections of no more than 12 weeks.
In both studies, the primary endpoint of efficacy was the proportion of patients who met the protocol requirements, which maintained visual acuity, implying a loss of less than 15 letters on a scale ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, Study of early treatment of diabetic retinopathy) at 52 weeks compared with baseline.
In the study VIEW1 at the 52nd week achieved improvement in visual acuity 95.1% of patients who received Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly injections, compared with 94.4% of patients who received ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks.
In the study VIEW2 at the 52nd week achieved improvement in visual acuity was maintained in 95.6% of patients who received Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly injections, compared with 94.4% of patients receiving ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks.
In both studies it was shown that Eilea® and ranibizumab, used in a dose of 0.5 mg every 4 weeks, are comparable in clinical effectiveness.
A detailed description of the results of the combined data analysis of both studies is given in Table 1.
Table 1: Evaluation of efficacy at 52nd and 96th week; combined data research VIEW1 and VIEW2
Efficiency mark
| Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly injections (N=607) | Ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (N=595) |
Week 52 | 96 week | Week 52 | 96 week |
Average number of injections | 7,6 | 11,2 | 12,3 | 16,5 |
Average number of injections (weeks 52-96) |
| 4,2 |
| 4,7 |
The proportion of patients with a loss of ≤15 letters with the most corrected visual acuity (IHEC) compared to the baseline | 95,33 % | 92,42 % | 94,42 % | 91,60% |
The mean change in the maximally corrected visual acuity (IHEC), measured on a scale ETDRS in comparison with the initial state | 8,40 | 7,62 | 8,74 | 7,89 |
|
The proportion of patients who added ≥15 letters on the scale ETDRS in comparison with the initial state | 30,97 % | 33,44 % | 32,44 % | 31,60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In patients treated with Eilea® (one injection per month for three consecutive months, then one injection every 2 months), the thickness of the central retina (TSZS) and the mean size of the area of pathological neovascularization decreased soon after treatment,which corresponds to the results obtained with ranibizumab at a dose of 0.5 mg every month. The achieved reduction in the size of the zone of pathological neovascularization and TZZS remained stable in the second year of studies to the last evaluation at week 96, with 2-4% of patients requiring all injections on a monthly basis, and one third of patients requiring at least one injection with a treatment interval of one month.
In both studies, there was a decrease in the zone of pathological neovascularization in all groups with different dosing regimens.
Macular edema, which has developed as a result of occlusion of the central vein of the retina (ICVs) or its branches (SABI)
With ICW and DVT, retinal ischemia develops, which is a signal for the release VEGF, which, in turn, leads to destabilization of dense contacts and stimulates the proliferation of endothelial cells. Increased expression VEGF is associated with complications such as a violation of the hemato-ophthalmic barrier, retinal edema due to increased vascular permeability, neovascularization. The safety and efficacy of Eilea® were evaluated in two randomized, multicenter, double-blind, controlledresearch COPERNICUS and GALILEO, including 358 patients with macular edema, which developed as a consequence of ICPV. In both studies, patients were randomized in a 3: 2 ratio to receive 2 mg of Eilea® every 4 weeks (217 patients) (Eilea® group 2q4), or a control group to receive imitations of injections every 4 weeks.
The study included patients aged 22 to 89 years, the average age was 64 years. In the studies of the NSCV, approximately 52% of the patients (112 of 217) randomized to the Eilea® group were 65 years of age or older, and approximately 18% (38 of 217) were aged 75 years or older.
After 6 consecutive monthly injections, patients continued to receive treatment only if they met pre-defined criteria for continuing therapy, except for the control group in the study GALILEO, who continued to receive imitations of injections before the 52nd week. From this point on, all patients were treated if they met pre-defined criteria.
In both studies, the primary endpoint of efficacy was the proportion of patients whose maximally corrected visual acuity (ICDH) increased by at least 15 letters in 24 weeks compared to the baseline condition.The secondary endpoint was a change in visual acuity at 24 weeks compared to the baseline.
Differences between the groups were statistically significant in favor of Eilea's drug in both studies, an improvement in ICDH was achieved after 3 months, followed by stabilization of visual acuity and TSZS until the 6th month. Statistically significant differences persisted until the 52nd week.
A detailed description of the results of the analysis of both studies is given in Table 2 and in Figure 1.
Table 2: Evaluation of effectiveness in studies COPERNICUS and GALILEO on the 24th, 52nd and 76 / 100th week.
Efficiency mark | The proportion of patients who added ≥15 letters compared to the baseline | Average change in the ICDH on a scale ETDRS in comparison with the initial state (CO1) |
COPERNICUS | 24 weeks | Control (N = 73) | 12% | -4,0(18,0) |
Eilea® 2 mg every 4 weeks (N=114) | 56% | 17,3(12,8) |
52 weeks | Control2 (N = 73) | 30% | 3,8(17,1) |
Eilea® 2 mg (N = 114) | 55 % | 16,2(17,4) |
100 weeks | Control2,3 (N = 73) | 23,3 % | 1,5(17,7) |
Eilea® 32 mg (N = 114) | 49,1 % | 13,0(17,7) |
GALILEO | 24 weeks | Control (N = 68) | 22% | 3,3(14,1) |
Eilea® 2 mg every 4 weeks (N=103) | 60% | 18,0(12,2) |
52 weeks | Control (N = 68) | 32% | 3,8(18,1) |
Eilea® 2 mg (N = 103) | 60% | 16,9(14,8) |
76 weeks | Control4 (N = 68) | 29,4 % | 6,2(17,7) |
Eilea® 4 2 mg (N = 103) | 57,3 % | 13,7(17,8) |
1) CO: standard deviation
2) In the study COPERNICUS patients of the control group could receive Eilea® as needed (PRN) every 4 weeks for the period from 24 to 52 weeks, patients visited the doctor every 4 weeks.
3) In the study COPERNICUS and the control group and the Eilea® group of 2 mg received Eilea® 2 mg as needed (PRN) every 4 weeks from 52 to 96 weeks: patients were obliged to visit the doctor every quarter, but if necessary, they could come to the clinic every 4 weeks.
4) In the study GALILEO from 52 to 68 weeks and the control group and the Eilea ® 2 mg group received Eilea ® 2 mg as needed (PRN) every 8 weeks, patients came to the reception without fail every 8 weeks.
The safety and efficacy of Eilea® was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial VIBRANT, including 181 patients with macular edema that developed as a result of hemodialysis, including hemiretinal occlusion of the central vein of the retina. In this study, patients were randomized in a 1: 1 ratio to receive Eilea® at a dose of 2 mg every 8 weeks after 6 initial monthly injections (91 patients), or in a group of patients initially receiving laser photocoagulation (active control group).
The study included patients aged 42 to 94 years, the average age was 65 years.In a study on PEP, approximately 58% of the patients (53 of 91) randomized to the Eilea® group were aged 65 years or older, and approximately 23% (21 of 91) were aged 75 years or older.
Starting with the 12th week, patients in the active control group could receive additional laser photocoagulation, called "rescue therapy" with a minimum interval of 12 weeks. Since the 24th week, active control group patients who meet pre-defined criteria could receive "rescue therapy" with Eilea® 2 mg every 4 weeks for 3 months, then every 8 weeks.
In the study VIBRANT the primary endpoint of effectiveness was the proportion of patients whose MCHD increased by at least 15 letters in 24 weeks compared with the baseline, this figure in the Eilea group was higher than in the active control group.
In the study VIBRANT the secondary endpoint was an improvement in visual acuity at week 24 compared with the baseline, which was statistically significant in favor of Eilea®. Improvement of vision occurred quickly and reached a maximum value for the 3rd month, with subsequent preservation of the values reached before the 12th month.
Since the 24th week, 67 patients in the active control group received "rescue therapy" with Eilea® (Active Control / Eilea * 2 mg group), which improved the visual acuity by an average of 5 letters from the 24th week of the 52- y week.
Detailed description of the results of the analysis of the study VIBRANT is shown in Table 3 and in Figure 2.
Efficiency mark | The proportion of patients who added ≥15 letters compared to the baseline | Average change in the ICDH on a scale ETDRS in comparison with the initial state (CO1) |
24 weeks | Eilea® 2 mg every 4 weeks (N=91) | 52,7 % | 17,0(11,9) |
Active control (N = 90) | 26,7 % | 6,9(12,9) |
52 weeks | Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks (N=91)2 | 57,1 % | 17,1(13,1) |
Active control / Eilea® 2 mg (N=90)3 | 41,1 % | 12,2(11,9) |
1) CO: standard deviation
2) The treatment interval for all Eilea® patients was increased to 8 weeks during the 24th to 48th week period.
3) Starting at week 24, active control group patients who met at least one of the predefined criteria could receive "rescue therapy" with Eilea® (a total of 67 patients). The fixed mode of "rescue therapy" with Eilea®-Eilea® in a dose of 2 mg every 4 weeks for 3 months, then intravitreal injections every 8 weeks.
Patients who received 6 consecutive monthly injections of 2 mg of Eilea ® received a persistent, rapid and pronounced morphological response (measured by an improvement in the mean values of TCHA). At week 24, the decrease in TSCI was statistically significantly higher than in the control group in all three studies (COPERNICUS (NCSA): -457 microns with respect to -145 microns,
GALILEO (NCVC): -449 microns with respect to -169 microns, VIBRANT (DEWAC): -280 microns with respect to -128 microns). The achieved decrease in TSCA was maintained until the end of each study: up to 100 weeks in the study COPERNICUS, up to 76 weeks in the study GALILEO and up to 52 weeks in the study VIBRANT.
Diabetic macular edema (DMO)
Diabetic macular edema is a consequence of diabetic retinopathy and is characterized by increased vascular permeability and damage to the retinal capillaries, which can lead to loss of visual acuity.
The safety and efficacy of Eilea ® in patients with diabetic macular edema were evaluated in two randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active control studies. A total of 862 patients were randomized.Of these, 576 patients were randomized to Eilea® in two studies (VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME). In each study, patients were randomly assigned to three groups in a ratio of 1: 1: 1:
1) Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks for the first 5 months;
2) Eilea® 2 mg every 4 weeks;
3) laser coagulation in the macula (active control).
The study included patients aged 23 to 87 years, the average age was 63 years. In the Phase III studies, the diabetic macular edema of approximately 47% of the patients (268 out of 576) randomized to Eilea® was 65 years of age or older, and approximately 9% (52 of 576) aged 75 years or older. Most patients included in both studies had Type II diabetes.
Since the 24th week, patients who meet predetermined vision loss thresholds could receive additional therapy: patients in Eilea® groups could receive laser coagulation, and patients in the control group receive therapy with Eilea®.
In both studies, the primary endpoint of efficacy was the mean value of the maximum corrected visual acuity (ISCED) at week 52 compared to the baseline,which in the Eilea groups "2 mg every 8 weeks for the first 5 months and Eilea" 2 mg every 4 weeks was statistically significant and exceeded the parameters in the control group. This advantage was maintained until the 100th week.
Detailed description of research results VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME is shown in Table 4 and in Figure 3.
Table 4: Evaluation of efficacy at 52nd and 100th week in studies VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME
In studies VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME 36 (9%) and 197 (43%) patients respectively received the anti--VEGF Therapy, with a washing period of 3 months or more. Effects of treatment in subgroups of patients who received pre-therapy with inhibitors VEGF, were similar to the effects observed in patients who were first treated with inhibitors VEGF.
Patients with bilateral lesions could receive anti--VEGF therapy of another eye, if the attending physician considered it necessary. In the study VISTA-DME 217 (70.7%) patients receiving Eilea ® received Eilea® in both eyes before the 100th week; in the study VIVID-DME 97 (35.8%) patients receiving the preparation Eilea ®, injected various anti--VEGF drugs in the other eye.
The parameters of efficiency and safety were comparable with those for the general population.
Shortly after the initiation of therapy, patients who received Eilea® therapy received a rapid and pronounced response from morphological indicators (TSCA, the severity rating scale for diabetic retinopathy (DRSS)). In studies VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME the mean decrease in TSCV compared to baseline at week 52 was statistically significantly higher in the Eilea® group compared to the laser therapy group: -192.4 micron and -183.1 microns in the Eilea® 2 mg group every 8 weeks for the first 5 months and -66.2 microns and -73.3 microns in the laser therapy group, respectively.
In studies VIVID-DME and V1STA-DME improvement of the course of diabetic retinopathy by 2 or more levels on a scale DRSS was assessed in a pre-established manner and was determined in 73.7% of patients in the study VIVID-DME and in 98.3% of patients in the study VISTA-DME.
In an independent comparative study (DRCR.net Protocol T), a dosing regimen based on strict OCT criteria and a change in vision during re-treatment was applied. In the group of treatment with aflibercept (224 patients), the result of this treatment regimen was the patients receiving an average of 9.2 injections,which is similar to the number of doses received in Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks for the first 5 months in studies VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME, while the overall efficacy in the aflibercept treatment group in the study Protocol T was comparable to that in Eilea® 2 mg every 8 weeks for the first 5 months in studies VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. In the study Protocol T, an improvement of 13.3 letters was observed on average, in 42% vision improved by at least 15 letters compared to the initial state. Ophthalmic and system safety profiles (including ATS (arterial thromboembolic events)) were comparable with those in studies VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME.
Myopic choroidal neovascularization (myopic CNV)
Myopic choroidal neovascularization (myopic CNV) is a frequent cause of vision loss in adults with pathological myopia. It is manifested by the appearance of "lacquer cracks", which are a consequence of the ruptures of the Bruch's membrane, and is the most threatening sight in pathological myopia. The safety and efficacy of Eilea® in previously untreated patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization were evaluated in a randomizeda multicenter, double-blind, controlled study MYRROR. Patients were randomized in a 3: 1 ratio to receive 2 mg of Eilea ® drug intravitreal or to receive injection simulations once at the beginning of the study with additional injections if the disease persisted or relapsed before the 24th week. Since the 24th week, patients who received imitations of injections could receive the first dose of Eilea ®. Then patients of both groups could receive additional injections if the disease persisted or relapsed. A total of 121 patients were treated and evaluated for efficacy, of which 90 patients received Eilea ®. Patients aged 27 to 83 years were included in the study, the average age was 58 years. In a study of myopic CNV, approximately 36% (33 of 91) of patients randomized to the Eilea® group were 65 years of age or older, and approximately 10% (9 of 91) were aged 75 years or older. Differences between the groups were statistically significant in favor of Eilea® at the primary endpoint (change in ICDH) and confirming at the secondary endpoint (the proportion of patients with whom MCHO increased by at least 15 letters) at Week 24 compared to baseline .Differences on both endpoints persisted until the 48th week.
Detailed description of the research results MYRROR is shown in Table 5 and in Figure 4.
Table 5: Performance evaluation at week 24 (primary analysis) and 48th week in research MYRROR
Efficiency mark | MYRROR |
Week 24 | Week 48 |
Eilea® 2 mg (N = 90) | Imitation of injection (N = 31) | Eilea® 2 mg (N = 90) | Simulation of injection / Eilea® 2 mg (N=31) |
Average change in the ICDH on a scale ETDRS in comparison with the initial state (CO1) | 12,1 (8,3) | -2,0 (9,7) | 13,5 (8,8) | 3,9(14,3) |
The proportion of patients who added> 15 letters on the scale ETDRS in comparison with the initial state | 38,9 % | 9,7 % | 50,0 % | 29,0 % |
1) CO: standard deviation
In the study MYRROR in patients treated with Eilea® (one injection at the beginning of the therapy, with additional injections if the disease persisted or relapsed), the TSCS decreased soon after the start of treatment, at week 24 was statistically significantly superior in the Eilea® group (-79 and -4 microns for the Eilea * 2 mg group and the control group, respectively) and was maintained until the 48th week. In addition, the average size of CNV lesion decreased.