Sitagliptin is generally well tolerated both in the monotherapy regimen, and in combination with other hypoglycemic drugs. In clinical trials, the overall incidence of undesired events, as well as the frequency of drug withdrawal due to adverse events, were similar to those observed with placebo.
According to 4 placebo-controlled studies (duration 18-24 weeks) of sitagliptin in a daily dose of 100-200 mg as a monotherapy or combination therapy with metformin or pioglitazone, there were no adverse events associated with the study drug, the frequency of which exceeded 1% in the group of patients who took sitagliptin. The safety profile of the daily dose of 200 mg was comparable to the safety profile of the daily dose of 100 mg.
Analysis of the data obtained in the above clinical studies showed that the overall incidence of hypoglycemia in patients taking sitagliptin, was similar to that of placebo (sitagliptin 100 mg - 1.2%, sitagliptin 200 mg - 0.9%, placebo - 0.9%). The frequency of monitored adverse events from the gastrointestinalof the tract when receiving sitagliptin in both doses was similar to that of placebo (except for the more frequent occurrence of nausea when taking sitagliptin at a dose of 200 mg per day): abdominal pain (sitagliptin 100 mg - 2.3%, sitagliptin 200 mg - 1.3%, placebo - 2.1%), nausea (1.4%, 2.9%, 0.6%), vomiting (0.8%, 0.7%, 0.9% ), diarrhea (3.0%, 2.6%, 2.3%).
In all studies, adverse reactions in the form of hypoglycemia were recorded on the basis of all reports of clinically expressed symptoms of hypoglycemia: a parallel measurement of blood glucose concentration was not required.
Start combination therapy with metformin
In a 24-week placebo-controlled factorial study of starting combination therapy with sitagliptin in a daily dose of 100 mg and metformin at a daily dose of 1000 mg or 2000 mg (sitagliptin 50 mg + metformin 500 mg or 1000 mg x 2 times a day), the following adverse events were observed in the combination treatment group compared with the metformin monotherapy group: adverse drug reactions observed with a frequency of ≥1% in the sitagliptin treatment group and in the bowl than in the metformin treatment group in monotherapy: diarrhea (sitagliptin + metformin - 3,5%, metformin - 3,3%), dyspepsia (1.3%, 1.1%), headache (1.3%, 1.1%), flatulence (1.3%, 0.5%), hypoglycemia (1 , 1%, 0.5%), vomiting (1.1%, 0.3%).
Combination with derivatives of sulfonylurea or derivatives of sulfonylureas and metformin
In a 24-week, placebo-controlled study of sitagliptin combined therapy (daily dose of 100 mg) and glimepiride or glimepiride and metformin in the study drug group compared with the placebo group and glimepiride or glimepiride and metformin, the following undesirable phenomena were observed: adverse drug reactions observed with a frequency of ≥1% in the sitagliptin treatment group and in the bowl than in the combination therapy group with placebo: hypoglycemia (sitagliptin - 9.5%, placebo - 0.9%).
Start combination therapy with agonists PPAR-γ
In a 24-week study of starting combination therapy with sitagliptin in a daily dose of 100 mg and pioglitazone at a daily dose of 30 mg, the following adverse events were observed in the combination treatment group compared to monotherapy with pioglitazone: related adverse reactions observed with a frequency of ≥1% in the sitagliptin treatment group and the bowl than in the pioglitazone treatment group in monotherapy: asymptomatic decrease in the concentration of glucose in the blood (sitagliptin + pioglitazone - 1,1%, pioglitazone - 0,0%), symptomatic hypoglycemia (0.4%, 0.8%).
Combination with agonists PPAR-γ and metformin
According to a placebo-controlled study in the treatment of sitagliptin (daily dose of 100 mg) in combination with rosiglitazone and metformin in the study drug group, compared with the group of patients taking placebo with rosiglitazone and metformin, the following adverse events were observed:
At week 18 of observation: adverse drug reactions observed with a frequency of ≥1% in the sitagliptin treatment group and in the bowl than in the combination therapy group with placebo: headache (sitagliptin - 2.4%, placebo - 0.0%), diarrhea (1.8%, 1.1%), nausea (1.2%, 1.1%), hypoglycemia (1.2%, 0.0%) , vomiting (1.2%, 0.0%).
At the 54th week of follow-up: adverse drug reactions observed with a frequency of ≥1% in the sitagliptin treatment group and in the bowl than in the combination therapy group with placebo: headache (sitagliptin - 2.4%, placebo - 0.0%), hypoglycemia (2.4%, 0.0%), upper respiratory tract infection (1.8%, 0.0%), nausea (1.2% 1.1%), cough (1.2%, 0.0%), fungal skin infection (1.2%, 0.0%), peripheral edema (1.2%, 0.0%), vomiting ( 1.2%, 0.0%).
Combination with insulin
In a 24-week, placebo-controlled study of combined sitagliptin therapy (at a daily dose of 100 mg) and a constant dose of insulin (with or without metformin) in the study drug group, compared to the placebo and insulin group (with or without metformin) the following undesirable phenomena: adverse drug reactions observed with a frequency of ≥1% in the sitagliptin treatment group and the bowl than in the insulin treatment group (with or without metformin): hypoglycemia (sitagliptin + insulin (with or without metformin) - 9.6%, placebo + insulin (with or without metformin) - 5.3%), influenza (1.2%, 0.3%), headache (1.2%, 0 , 0%).
In another 24-week study in which patients received sitagliptin as an adjunct therapy for insulin therapy (with or without metformin), there were no undesirable reactions associated with taking the drug, with a frequency of ≥ 1% in the sitagliptin group (100 mg dose), and more often than in the placebo group.
Pancreatitis
In a generalized analysis of 19 double-blind, randomized clinical trials of the use of sitagliptin in a daily dose of 100 mg or the corresponding(active or placebo), the incidence of acute pancreatitis was 0.1 cases per 100 patient-years of treatment in each group (see "Precautions. Pancreatitis").
Clinically significant deviations in vital signs or ECG (including the duration of the interval QTc) on the background of treatment with sitagliptin was not observed.
Post-market observations
In the course of post-marketing monitoring of the use of sitagliptin in monotherapy and / or combined therapy with other hypoglycemic agents, additional undesirable phenomena were identified. Since these data were obtained voluntarily from a population of undetermined size, the frequency and cause-and-effect relationship with the treatment of these undesirable phenomena can not be determined. These include: hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis, angioedema, rash, hives, skin vasculitis, exfoliative skin diseases, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome; acute pancreatitis, including hemorrhagic and necrotic forms with lethal and without lethal outcome; impairment of kidney function,including acute renal failure (sometimes dialysis is required); upper respiratory tract infection; nasopharyngitis; constipation; vomiting; headache; arthralgia; myalgia; pain in the limb; backache; itching; pemphigoid.
Changes in laboratory indicators
The frequency of deviations in laboratory parameters in the groups of treatment with sitagliptin (in a daily dose of 100 mg) was comparable with the frequency in the placebo groups. Most, but not all, of the clinical studies showed a slight increase in leukocyte count (approximately 200 / μL compared with placebo, with an average content of 6600 / μL at the beginning of treatment), due to an increase in the number of neutrophils.
Analysis of clinical trial data showed a slight increase in the concentration of uric acid (approximately 0.2 mg / dl compared with placebo, mean pre-treatment concentration 5-5.5 mg / dL) in patients who received sitagliptin in a dose of 100 and 200 mg per day.
There were no cases of gout development. There was a slight decrease in the concentration of total alkaline phosphatase (approximately 5 IU / L compared with placebo, average concentration before treatment 56-62 IU / L), partially associated with a slight decrease in the bone fraction of alkaline phosphatase.
The listed changes in laboratory indicators are not considered clinically significant.